Skateaway…that's all

July 4, 2009

The book,’My Sister’s Keeper’ was WORSE than the movie!

I bought ‘My Sister’s Keeper’ on Sunday and finished reading it today. It is a terrible book.There were numerous grammar errors, every character was two-dimensional and did not differ in speech patterns and the time change between the past and present was unorganized and broke up the flow of the story.

Each metaphor used was explained, as if the reader is too stupid to figure out what it represents. Giving each character a different font didn’t change the fact that they spoke in exactly the same way. Telling the story in the third-person would have been a much more effective way to tell the story while still including the individual characters thoughts and feelings.

Speaking of individual characters, Julia was not necessary. There is a reason she way removed from the movie. She is completely useless. Campbell doesn’t need a love interest; his job is to help Anna. The book spread itself too thin. The characters the book should have focused on were Anna and Kate.

To quote an Amazon.com reviewer, Anna and Kate’s mother, Sara, was, “The kind of character you wish was real so you could punch her.” She was the most selfish, self-centered, narcissistic person through out the entire book. Sara didn’t care about Anna. Sara didn’t even care about Kate. Sara cared about how losing her children would affect her and her life.

The father seemed to care about Kate, at least, but both parents did a terrible job at parenting. Their son Jesse does a lot of bad things in the book. The parents talk about how they’ve given up expecting good things from him, blah blah blah. Perhaps if some attention was paid to the other children,and not just for the benefit of Kate, Jesse would have become a better man.

The lawyer, Campbell Alexander, was a good character. However, as stated above, his relationship with Julia added nothing to the story. It was stupid and pointless and showed how little the author knows about how the law and the courts work. I did enjoy Campbell’s made-up reasons for needing a service dog.

Kate’s voice should have been included in the book. The plot should have been nothing but the trial with Anna and Kate’s feelings, and Sara demonstrating how little she cares about her children. That was what the plot came down to. The other was just filler and an attempt by the author to showcase her “skills” and incorporating useless metaphors and analogies.

The ending was a complete cop-out. It demonstrated that the author didn’t know how to end the book, and so instead took the easy way out. Sara was right, Anna was wrong, and Anna’s only reason for existing was to help Kate. Everything works out because the next ten years are wrapped up in one neat little chapter.

Disappointed does not begin to cover how I feel about this book. I would like to read a book that does a good job at dealing with the ethics surrounding new medical technology. Perhaps someone could recommend a title to me?

4 Comments »

  1. I really enjoyed your review, and really felt the same way that you do. I also will not be watching the movie.

    Comment by Amber (fearies_kiss) — July 6, 2009 @ 8:49 am | Reply

    • Thanks! The plot of the story required a competent author and Jodi Picoult just wasn’t up to the task. If the same type of novel is written by a writer with talent, it could be great! So I guess I better get started on it right away ;)

      Comment by rollergurl — July 6, 2009 @ 11:35 pm | Reply

  2. I hated the ending of the book!I thought it made the whole story pointless. Here is a girl (Kate) who has fought cancer all of her life. She is done – she is finally ready to let go. Death is sad, but it is a part of life. It should be ok to die when the time is right. Then there is Anna, who is taking the entire burden on to herself for her sister. Initiating the law suit because Kate can’t face telling her mom that she’s ready to die.

    Also, you have the whole speculation that even if Anna does go through with the kidney transplant, Kate will still probably not be ok.

    So how does the book end? Anna dies, her kidneys are donated, and Kate lives. So if Anna hadn’t initiated the law suit for her sister and just donated the kidneys, everything would have been perfect for the family. WHAT? Then what was the point of the book? I don’t get it. The “shocking” ending is useless and seems to negate the book. I know Picoult often likes to leave things ambiguous so that people can form their own opinions, but really… that’s what Kate’s death would have done.

    Comment by Bobbi Jo — July 14, 2009 @ 11:46 am | Reply

    • Exactly!Sara was hateful and horrible and the ending made it seem as though she was right all along! If Anna had done what her mum wanted her to do then she wouldn’t have died. It completely tears apart the rest of the book :(

      Comment by rollergurl — July 14, 2009 @ 2:34 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.